To the content
3 . 2019

Prediction is better than treatment. Risk strategy

Abstract

The development of systems for predicting the risk of critical conditions in obstetrics has been lasting over the past several decades, and unfulfilled hopes regarding electronic methods of diagnostics have brought the need for such systems to the forefront. Domestic and foreign experience with these systems has proven their effectiveness, and their digitization coupled with communication technology provide new opportunities for the more accurate calculation of individual risk consistent with the contemporary paradigm of personalized preventive medicine.

Keywords:рrediction, risk strategy, prevention, personalized medicine

For citation: Knyazev S.A., Zhilinkova N.G. Prediction is better than treatment. Risk strategy. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie [Obstetrics and Gynecology: News, Opinions, Training]. 2019; 7 (3): 83-7. doi: 10.24411/2303-9698-2019-13012. (in Russian)

Литература

1. URL: https://static-3.rosminzdrav.ru/system/attachments/attaches/000/042/420/original/85_proections_A_2_8-compressed.pdf. (дата обращения: 19.05.2019)

2. Комаров Ю.М. О научной основе Семашкинской модели здравоохранения // ОРГЗДРАВ: новости, мнения, обучение. 2015. № 1. С. 120-127.

3. Браун К. Руководство к акушерству. СПб., 1860.

4. Goodwin J.W., Dunne Т., Thomas B.W. Antepartum identification of the fetus at risk // Can. Med. Assoc. J. 1969. Vol. 101. P. 458.

5. Nesbitt R.E.L., Aubry R.H. High-risk obstetrics. II. Value of semi-objective grading system in identifying the vulnerable group // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1969. Vol. 103. P. 972.

6. Радзинский В.Е. Акушерская агрессия. 2-е изд., доп. и испр. М. : StatusPraesens, 2016.

7. Creasy R.K., Gummer B.A., Liggins G.C. System for predicting spontaneous preterm birth // Obstet. Gynecol. 1980. Vol. 55, N 6. P. 692-695. PMID: 7383454.

8. Knox A.J. et al. An obstetric scoring system: its development and application in obstetric management // Obstet. Gynecol. 1993. Vol. 81, N 2. P. 195-199. PMID: 8423949.

9. Kuru A. et al. The determination of high-risk pregnancy: the use of antenatal scoring system // Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013. Vol. 40, N 3. P. 381-383. PMID: 24283170.

10. Veen M.J. van et al. Feasibility and reliability of a newly developed antenatal risk score card in routine care // Midwifery. 2015. Vol. 31, N 1. P. 147-154. PMID: 25194982.

11. Приказ Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации от 01.11.2012 № 572н "Порядок оказания медицинской помощи по профилю "Акушерство и гинекология" (за исключением использования вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий)".

12. Князев С.А. Резервы снижения перинатальной заболеваемости при абдоминальном родоразрешении : автореф. дис. ... канд. мед. наук. М., 2003. 19 с.

13. Радзинский В.Е., Костин И.Н., Мамедова М.А. Влияние интрана-тальных факторов на исход родов ("интранатальный прирост") // Вестн. РУДН. Серия "Медицина". 2007. № 5. С. 70-73.

14. Михеенко Г.А., Михеенко Г.А., Агаркова Л.А., Махмутходжаев А.Ш. и др. Оценка прогноза перинатального риска беременности, наступившей в результате применения вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий при трубно-перитонеальном бесплодии // Соврем. пробл. науки и образования. 2015. № 6. URL: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/ article/view?id=23880. (дата обращения: 06.03.2019)

15. Князев С.А.Интранатальные компоненты перинатального риска// Вестн. РУДН. Серия "Медицина. Акушерство и гинекология". 2006. № 5. С. 112-116.

16. Приказ Минздрава СССР от 22.04.1981 № 430 "Об утверждении инструктивно-методических указаний по организации работы женской консультации".

17. Акушерство : национальное руководство / под ред. Э.К. Айла-мазяна, В.И. Кулакова, В.Е. Радзинского, Г.М. Савельевой. М. : ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2014. 1200 с.

References

1. URL: https://static-3.rosminzdrav.ru/system/attachments/attaches/000/042/420/original/85_proections_A_2_8-compressed.pdf. (date of access: 19.05.2019)

2. Komarov Yu.M. About a scientific basis of Semashko health care model. ORGZDRAV: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie. Vestnik VSHOUZ [HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT: News, Views, Education. Bulletin of VSHOUZ ] 2015; 1 (1): 120-7. (in Russian)

3. Brown K. Guide to obstetrics. Saint Petersburg, 1860.

4. Goodwin J.W., Dunne Т., Thomas B.W. Antepartum identification of the fetus at risk. Can. Med Assoc J. 1969; 101: 458.

5. Nesbitt R.E.L., Aubry R.H. High-risk obstetrics. II. Value of semiobjective grading system in identifying the vulnerable group. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1969; 103: 972.

6. Radzinsky V.E. Obstetric aggression. 2nd ed. Moscow: StatusPraesens, 2016. (in Russian)

7. Creasy R.K., Gummer B.A., Liggins G.C. System for predicting spontaneous preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 1980; 55 (6): 692-5. PMID: 7383454.

8. Knox A.J., et al. An obstetric scoring system: its development and application in obstetric management. Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 81 (2): 195-9. PMID: 8423949.

9. Kuru A., et al. The determination of high-risk pregnancy: the use of antenatal scoring system. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 40 (3): 381-3. PMID: 24283170.

10. Veen M.J. van, et al. Feasibility and reliability of a newly developed antenatal risk score card in routine care. Midwifery. 2015; 31 (1): 147-54. PMID: 25194982.

11. Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation of 01.11.2012 No. 572n "The procedure for providing medical care in the profile" Obstetrics and Gynecology "(except for the use of assisted reproductive technologies)". (in Russian)

12. Knyazev S.A. Reserves to reduce perinatal morbidity during abdominal delivery. Autoabstract of Diss. Moscow, 2003. 19 р. (in Russian)

13. Radzinsky V.E., Kostin I.N., Mamedova M.A. The influence of intranatal factors on the outcome of childbirth (“intranatal growth”). Vestnik RUDN. Seriya “Meditsina” [Bulletin of Russian Peoples' Friendship University. Series “Medicine”]. 2007; 5: 70-3. (in Russian)

14. Mikheenko G.A., Agarkova L.A., Makhmutkhodzhaev A.Sh., Korotkova Yu.Yu. Assessment of the forecast of perinatal risk of the pregnancy which was caused application of auxiliary reproductive technologies at pipe and peritonealny infertility. Sovremennyy problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Modern Problems of Science and Education]. 2015; 6. URL: http:// www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=23880. (датаобращения: 06.03.2019) (in Russian)

15. Knyazev S.A. Intranatal components of perinatal risk. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya "Meditsina. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya" [Bulletin of Russian Peoples' Friendship Universityhe. Series “Medicine. Obstetrics and gynecology]. 2006; 5: 112-6. (in Russian)

16. Order of the Ministry of Health of the USSR of April 22, 1981 No. 430 “On approval of instructional guidelines for the organization of the work of antenatal clinics”. (in Russian)

17. Obstetrics: national leadership. Ed. by E.K. Aylamazyan, V.I. Kulakov, V.E. Radzinsky, G.M. Saveleva. M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2014. 1200 p. (in Russian)

All articles in our journal are distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International)

CHIEF EDITORS
CHIEF EDITOR
Sukhikh Gennadii Tikhonovich
Academician of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, V.I. Kulakov Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology National Medical Research Center of Ministry of Healthсаre of the Russian Federation, Moscow
CHIEF EDITOR
Kurtser Mark Arkadievich
Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, MD, Professor, Head of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Subdepartment of the Pediatric Department, N.I. Pirogov Russian National Scientific Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
CHIEF EDITOR
Radzinsky Viktor Evseevich
Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, MD, Professor, Head of the Subdepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology with a Course of Perinatology of the Medical Institute in the Russian People's Friendship University named after P. Lumumbа

Journals of «GEOTAR-Media»