REFERENCES
1. Gleicher N., Albertini D.F., Barad D.H., Homer H., Modi D., Murtinger M., et al.; International Do Not Harm Group in IVF (IDNHG-IVF). The 2019 PGDIS position statement on transfer of mosaic embryos within a context of new information on PGT-A. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020; 18 (1): 57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-020-00616-w
2. Webster A., Schuh M. Mechanism of aneuploidy in human eggs. Trends Cell Biol. 2017; 27 (1): 55–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2016.09.002
3. McKinlay Gardner R.J., Amor D.J. Gardner and Sutherland’s chromosome abnormalities and genetic counseling. In: Oxford Monographs on Medical Genetics. 5th ed. Oxford University Press, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199329007.001.0001
4. Gardner D., Schoolcraft W., Wagley L., Schlenker T., Stevens J., Hesla J. A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in IVF. Hum Reprod. 1998; 13 (12): 3434–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.12.3434
5. Hollands P. The Fertility Promise: the Facts Behind in vitro Fertilisation (IVF). Bentham Science Publishers, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/9789815040289121010013
6. Aparicio-Ruiz B., Romany L., Meseguer M. Selection of preimplantation embryos using time-lapse microscopy in in vitro fertilization: state of the technology and future directions. Birth Defects Res. 2018; 110 (8): 648–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bdr2.1226
7. ESHRE Working Group on Time-Lapse Technology; Apter S., Ebner T., Freour T., Guns Y., Kovacic B., Le Clef N., et al. Good practice recommendations for the use of time-lapse technology. Hum Reprod Open. 2020; 2020 (2): hoaa008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaa008
8. Yang Q., Zhu L., Wang M., Huang B., Li Z., Hu J., et al. Analysis of maturation dynamics and developmental competence of in vitro matured oocytes under time-lapse monitoring. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021; 19: 183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00868-0
9. Jin L., Dong X., Tan W., Huang B. Incidence, dynamics and recurrences of reverse cleavage in aneuploid, mosaic and euploid blastocysts, and its relationship with embryo quality. J Ovarian Res. 2022; 15 (1): 91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-022-01026-9
10. Athayde Wirka K., Chen A.A., Conaghan J., Ivani K., Gvakharia M., Behr B., et al. Atypical embryo phenotypes identified by time-lapse microscopy: high prevalence and association with embryo development. Fertil Steril. 2014; 101 (6): 1637–48.e1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.02.050
11. Soukhov E., Karavani G., Szaingurten-Solodkin I., Alfayumi-Zeadna S., Elharar G., Richter D., et al. Prediction of embryo implantation rate using a sole parameter of timing of starting blastulation. Zigote. 2022; 30 (4): 501–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967199421000952
12. Ahlström A., Lundin K., Lind A.-K., Gunnarsson K., Westlander G., Park H., et al. A double-blind randomized controlled trial investigating a time-lapse algorithm for selecting Day 5 blastocysts for transfer. Hum Reprod. 2022; 37 (4): 708–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deac020
13. Reignier A., Lefebvre T., Loubersac S., Lammers J., Barriere P., Freour T. Time-lapse technology improves total cumulative live birth rate and shortens time to live birth as compared to conventional incubation system in couples undergoing ICSI. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021; 38 (4): 917–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02099-z
14. Storr A., Venetis C.A., Cooke S., Susetio D., Kilani S., Ledger W. Morphokinetic parameters using time-lapse technology and day 5 embryo quality: a prospective cohort study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015; 32 (7): 1151–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0534-y
15. Racowsky C., Kovacs P., Martins W.P. A critical appraisal of time-lapse imaging for embryo selection: where are we and where do we need to go? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015; 32 (7): 1025–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0510-6
16. Boueilh T., Reignier A., Barriere P., Freour T. Time-lapse imaging systems in IVF laboratories: a French national survey. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018; 35 (12): 2181–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1302-6
17. Ciray H.N., Campbell A., Agerholm I.E., Aguilar J., Chamayou S., Esbert M., et al.; Time-Lapse User Group. Proposed guidelines on the nomenclature and annotation of dynamic human embryo monitoring by a time-lapse user group. Hum Reprod. 2014; 29 (12): 2650–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humper/deu278
18. Rubio I., Galan A., Larreategui Z., Ayerdi F., Bellver J., Herrero J., et al. Clinical validation of embryo culture and selection by morphokinetic analysis: a randomized, controlled trial of the EmbryoScope. Fertil Steril. 2014; 102 (5): 1287–94.e5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.738
19. Lundin K., Ahlstrome A. Quality control and standardization of embryo morphology scoring and viability markers. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015; 31 (4): 459–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.06.026
20. Adamyan L.V., Pivazyan L.G., Krylova E.I., Obosyan L.B., Sarkisova A.I., Nikiforova P.O. The use of time-lapse technology in the process of cultivation, evaluation and selection of embryos during IVF and ICSI procedures: a systematic review. Problemy reproduktsii [Problems of Reproduction]. 2023; 29 (2): 14–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17116/repro29232902114 (in Russian)
21. Meseguer M., Hilligsoe K.M., Pedersen K.S., Herrero J., Tejera A., Garrido N. Pregnancy rates after incubation in new time-lapse incubator (embryoscope) providing detailed information about embryo development compared to incubation in a standard incubator. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94 (4): S150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.07.603
22. Cruz M., Gadea B., Garrido N., Pedersen K.S., Martínez M., Pérez-Cano I.,et al. Embryo quality, blastocyst and ongoing pregnancy rates in oocyte donation patients whose embryos were monitored by time-lapse imaging. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011; 28 (7): 569–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-011-9549-1