Maternal obesity and the risk of postpartum infections according to mode of delivery

• Axelsson D.
• Brynhildsen J.
• Blomberg M.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of different maternal Body Mass Index (BMI) classes on the risk of postpartum endometritis, wound infection, and breast abscess after different modes of delivery. Secondly to estimate how the risk of postpartum infection varies with different maternal BMI groups after induction of labor and after obstetric anal sphincter injuries.

Methods. A population-based observational study including women who gave birth during 8 years (n=841,780). Data were collected from three Swedish Medical Health Registers, the Swedish Medical Birth Register, the Swedish National Patient Register, and the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. Outcomes were defined by ICD-10 codes given within 8 weeks postpartum. The reference population was uninfected women. Odds ratios were determined using Mantel–Haenszel technique. Year of delivery, maternal age, parity and smoking in early pregnancy were considered as confounders.

Results. There was a dose-dependent relationship between an increasing maternal BMI and a higher risk for postpartum infections. Women in obesity class II and III had an increased risk for endometritis after normal vaginal delivery aOR 1.45 (95% CI 1.29–1.63) and for wound infections after cesarean section aOR 3.83 (95% CI 3.39–4.32). There was no difference in how maternal BMI affected the association between cesarean section and wound infection, regardless of whether it was planned or emergent. Women in obesity class II and III had a lower risk of breast abscess compared with normal-weight women, aOR 0.47 (95% CI 0.38–0.58). The risk of endometritis after labor induction decreased with increasing maternal BMI. The risk of wound infection among women with an obstetrical sphincter injury decreased with increasing BMI.

Conclusion. This study provides new knowledge about the impact of maternal BMI on the risk of postpartum infections after different modes of delivery. There was no difference in how BMI affected the association between cesarean section and wound infections, regardless of whether it was a planned cesarean section or an emergency cesarean section.

REFERENCES

1. Socialstyrelsen. Statistik om graviditeter, förlossningar och nyfödda barn 2021. URL: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelkatalog/statistik/2022-12-8275.pdf

2. Stierman B., Afful J., Carroll M., et al. National Health and Nutrition Exami- nation Survey 2017–March 2020 Prepandemic Data Files Development of Files and Prevalence Estimates for Selected Health Outcomes. Published Date: 06/14/2021. Series: NHSR No. 158. Source: National Health Statistics Reports. URL: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/106273

3. Marchi J., Berg M., Dencker A., et al. Risks associated with obesity in preg- nancy, for the mother and baby: a systematic review of reviews. Obes Rev. 2015; 16 (8): 621–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12288

4. Ahnfeldt-Mollerup P., Petersen L.K., Kragstrup J., et al. Postpartum infections: occurrence, healthcare contacts and association with breastfeeding. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012; 91 (12): 1440–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12008

5. Hebert P.R., Reed G., Entman S.S., et al. Serious maternal morbidity after childbirth: prolonged hospital stays and readmissions. Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 94 (6): 942–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006250-199912000-00008

6. Karsnitz D.B. Puerperal infections of the genital tract: a clinical review. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013; 58 (6): 632–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12119

7. Maharaj D. Puerperal pyrexia: a review. Part I. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2007; 62 (6): 393–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000265998.40912.5e

8. Sands K., Vineyard G., Platt R. Surgical site infections occurring after hospital discharge. J Infect Dis. 1996; 173 (4): 963–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/173.4.963

9. Axelsson D., Brynhildsen J., Blomberg M. Postpartum infection in relation to maternal characteristics, obstetric interventions and complications. J Perinat Med. 2018; 46 (3): 271–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2016-0389

10. Myles T.D., Gooch J., Santolaya J. Obesity as an independent risk factor for infectious morbidity in patients who undergo cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 100 (5 pt 1): 959–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02323-2

11. Wloch C., Wilson J., Lamagni T., et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection following caesarean section in England: results from a multicentre cohort study. BJOG. 2012; 119 (11): 1324–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03452.x

12. Robinson H.E., O’Connell C.M., Joseph K.S., et al. Maternal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by obesity. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 106 (6): 1357–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000188387.88032.41

13. Dahlquist K., Stuart A., Källén K. Planned cesarean section vs planned vaginal delivery among women without formal medical indication for planned cesarean section: a retrospective cohort study of maternal short-term complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022; 101 (9): 1026–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14408

14. The Swedish Medical Birth Register- a summary of content and quality. National Board of Health and Welfare. 2003. URL: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelkatalog/ovrigt/2003-112-3_20031123.pdf

15. Ludvigsson J.F., Andersson E., Ekbom A., et al. External review and validation of the Swedish National Inpatient Register. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11: 450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-450

16. Wettermark B., Hammar N., Fored C.M., et al. The new Swedish prescribed drug register–opportunities for pharmacoepidemiological research and experience from the first six months. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007; 16 (7): 726–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.1294

17. Mantel N., Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959; 22: 719–48.

18. Sebire N.J., Jolly M., Harris J.P., et al. Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287,213 pregnancies in London. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001; 25 (8): 1175–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801670

19. Blomberg M. Maternal body mass index and risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014: 395803. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/395803

20. Lindholm E.S., Altman D. Risk of obstetric anal sphincter lacerations among obese women. BJOG. 2013; 120 (9): 1110–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12228

21. Turcksin R., Bel S., Galjaard S., et al. Maternal obesity and breastfeeding intention, initiation, intensity and duration: a systematic review. Matern Child Nutr. 2014; 10 (2): 166–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8709.2012.00439.x

22. Ramji N., Challa S., Murphy P.A., et al. A comparison of breastfeeding rates by obesity class. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018; 10: 3021–6.

All articles in our journal are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0 license)