REFERENCES
1. Radzinsky V.E. Obstetric aggression. Moscow: StatusPraesens, 2017: 872 p. (in Russian)
2. Perin J., Mulick A., Yeung D., et al. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000–19: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022; 6 (2): 106–15.
3. Ohuma E., Moller A.-B., Bradley E., et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth in 2020, with trends from 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2023; 402 (10 409): 1261–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00878-4
4. Medyannikova I.V., Savel’eva I.V., Gachkaylo E.A., Prodanchuk E.G., Galyanskaya E.G., Nosova N.V., et al. Maternal risk factors for premature childbirth. Problemy reproduktsii [Problems of Reproduction]. 2023; 29 (5): 85–91. (in Russian)
5. Semenova Yu.A., Dolgushina V.F., Moskvicheva M.G., Chulkov V.S. Model of forecasting and management of premature birth. Vestnik Rossiyskoy akademii meditsinskikh nauk [Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences]. 2019; 74 (4): 221–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15690/vramn1085 (in Russian)
6. Beglov D.E., Artymuk N.V., Novikova O.N., Marochko K.V., Parfenova Ya.A. Risk factors for premature birth. Fundamental’naya i klinicheskaya meditsina [Fundamental and Clinical Medicine]. 2022; 7 (4): 8–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23946/2500-0764-2022-7-4-8-17
7. Glover A.V., Battarbee A.N., Gyamfi-Bannerman C., Boggess K.A., Sandoval G., Blackwell S.C., et al.; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Association between features of spontaneous late preterm labor and late preterm birth. Am J Perinatol. 2020; 37 (4): 357–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1696641 Epub 2019 Sep 17. PMID: 31529452; PMCID: PMC7058482.
8. Tsakiridis I., Dagklis T., Sotiriadis A., Mamopoulos A., Zepiridis L., Athanasiadis A. Third-trimester cervical length assessment for the prediction of spontaneous late preterm birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023; 36 (1): 2201368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2023.2201368 PMID: 37037654.
9. Berghella V., Saccone G. Cervical assessment by ultrasound for preventing preterm delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 9 (9): CD007235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007235.pub4 PMID: 31553800; PMCID: PMC6953418.
10. Deng K., Liang J., Mu Y., Liu Z., Wang Y., Li M., et al. Preterm births in China between 2012 and 2018: an observational study of more than 9 million women. Lancet Glob Health. 2021; 9 (9): e1226–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00298-9 PMID: 34416213; PMCID: PMC8386289.
11. Yoshida-Montezuma Y., Sivapathasundaram B., Brown H.K., et al. Association of late preterm birth and size for gestational age with cardiometabolic risk in childhood. JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5 (5): e2214379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.14379
12. Bandoli G., Chambers C.D. Autoimmune conditions and comorbid depression in pregnancy: examining the risk of preterm birth and preeclampsia. J Perinatol. 2019; 37 (10): 1082–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2017.109
13. Skorpen C.G., Lydersen S., Gilboe I.M., Skomsvoll J.F., Salvesen K.A., Palm O., et al. Influence of disease activity and medications on offspring birth weight, pre-eclampsia and preterm birth in systemic lupus erythematosus: a population-based study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019; 77 (2): 264–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211641
14. Volkov V.G., Badaeva A.A., Badaeva A.V. Prenatal stress as a risk factor for premature birth. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Modern Problems of Science and Education]. 2020; (5). URL: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=30143 (in Russian)
15. Tanpradit K., Kaewkiattikun K. The effect of perceived stress during pregnancy on preterm birth. Int J Womens Health. 2020; 12: 287–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2015.02.003
16. Yakovleva O.V., Glukhova T.N. Comparative effectiveness of predictors of premature birth. Lechashchiy vrach [Attending Physician]. 2019; (3): 52–5. (in Russian)
17. Department of Health. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Pregnancy Care. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health, 2018. URL: https://beta.health.gov.au/resources/pregnancy-care-guidelines/part-d-clinical-assessments/risk-of-preterm-birth
18. Oskovi Kaplan Z.A., Ozgu-Erdinc A.S. Prediction of preterm birth: maternal characteristics, ultrasound markers, and biomarkers: an updated overview. J Pregnancy. 2018; 2018: 8367571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8367571
19. Darghahi R., Mobaraki-Asl N., Ghavami Z., Pourfarzi F., Hosseini-Asl S., Jalilvand F. Effect of cell-free fetal DNA on spontaneous preterm labor. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2019; 10 (3): 117–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/japtr.JAPTR_371_18 PMID: 31334093; PMCID: PMC6621344.
20. Gomez-Lopez N., Romero R., Schwenkel G., Garcia-Flores V., Panaitescu B., Varrey A., et al. Cell-free fetal DNA increases prior to labor at term and in a subset of preterm births. Reprod Sci. 2020; 27 (1): 218–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-019-00023-6 Epub 2020 Jan 1. PMID: 32046392; PMCID: PMC7539810.
21. Kostin I.N., Knyazev S.A. A frank conversation. StatusPraesens. Ginekologiya. Akusherstvo. Besplodniy brak [StatusPraesens. Gynecology. Obstetrics. Barren Marriage]. 2018; 6 (53): 20–7. (in Russian)
22. Desplanches T., Lejeune C., Cottenet J., et al. Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic tests for threatened preterm labor in singleton pregnancy in France. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018; 16: 21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-018-0106-y
23. Park H., Park K.H., Kim Y.M., et al. Plasma inflammatory and immune proteins as predictors of intra-amniotic infection and spontaneous preterm delivery in women with preterm labor: a retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018; 18 (1): 146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1780-7
24. Kook S.Y., Park K.H., Jang J.A., et al. Vitamin D-binding protein in cervicovaginal fluid as a non-invasive predictor of intra-amniotic infection and impending preterm delivery in women with preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of membranes. PLoS One. 2018; 13 (6): 0198842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0198842
25. Di Fabrizio L., Giardina I., Cetin I., et al. New methods for preterm birth prediction: the PAMG-1 test. Minerva Ginecol. 2018; 70 (5): 635–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4784.18.04243-0 Epub 2018 May 31.
26. Melchor J.C., Navas H., Marcos M., et al. Predictive performance of PAMG-1 vs fFN test for risk of spontaneous preterm birth in symptomatic women attending an emergency obstetric unit: retrospective cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 51 (5): 644–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.18892 Epub 2018 Mar 26.
27. Ravi M., Beljorie M., Masry K. Evaluation of the quantitative fetal fibronectin test and PAMG-1 test for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of preterm labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019; 32 (23): 3909–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1476485
28. Santipap M., Phupong V. Combination of three-dimensional ultrasound measurement of foetal adrenal gland enlargement and placental alpha microglobulin-1 for the prediction of the timing of delivery within seven days in women with threatened preterm labour and preterm labour. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018; 38 (8): 1054–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2018.1446422
29. Nikolova T., Uotila J., Nikolova N., et al. Prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery in women presenting with premature labor: a comparison of placenta alpha microglobulin-1, phosphorylated insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1, and cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 219 (6): 610.e1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ajog.2018.09.016 Epub 2018 Sep 18.
30. Melchor J.C., Khalil A., Wing D., et al. Prediction of preterm delivery in symptomatic women using PAMG-1, fetal fibronectin and phIGFBP-1 tests: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 52 (4): 442–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.19119 Epub 2018 Sep 4.
31. Kim J.I., Cho M.O., Choi G.Y. Multiple factors in the second trimester of pregnancy on preterm labor symptoms and preterm birth. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2017; 47 (3): 357–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2017.47.3.357
32. Palacio M., Caradeux J., Sánchez M., et al. Uterine cervical length measurement to reduce length of stay in patients admitted for threatened preterm labor: a randomized trial. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2018; 43 (3): 184–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000477930 Epub 2017 Aug 17.
33. Agarwal S., Agarwal A., Joon P., et al. Fetal adrenal gland biometry and cervical elastography as predictors of preterm birth: a comparative study. Ultrasound. 2018; 26 (1): 54–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1742271X17748515 Epub 2018 Feb 7.
34. Hernandez-Andrade E., Maymon E., Luewan S., et al. A soft cervix, categorized by shear-wave elastography, in women with short or with normal cervical length at 18–24 weeks is associated with a higher prevalence of spontaneous preterm delivery. J Perinat Med. 2018; 46 (5): 489–501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2018-0062