Prediction of early pregnancy loss: versions and contraversions

• Irina M. Ordiyants
• Olga K. Molchanova
• Igor A. Aleyev
• Annagul Ismailova
• Madina Mukhammadzhanova

Abstract

Reproductive losses are a medical and social problem that is particularly relevant with the current decline in natural population growth. Currently, there are a large number of studies on early pregnancy losses, as well as many counter-controversial opinions. Despite this, the cause of reproductive losses remains completely unexplained. The article presents a review of domestic and foreign authors on the problem of predicting early reproductive losses. The latest data on the study of endometrial receptivity at the epigenetic level are presented.

Keywords:early reproductive losses; miscarriage; microRNA; endometrial receptivity; gene expression

REFERENCES

1. Ordiyants I.M., Barabasheva S.S. Non-developing pregnancy: view of the problem. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie [Obstetrics and Gynecology: News, Opinions, Training]. 2018; (3): 92-6. (in Russian)

2. Rumyantseva Z.S., Lyumanova E.Yu., Volotskaya N.I., Anikin S.S. Redictors of non-developing pregnancy and role of periconceptional care in prevention of recurrent pregnancy loss. Vyatskiy meditsinskiy vestnik [Vyatka Medical Bulletin]. 2021; 1 (69): 64-9. (in Russian)

3. Devall A., et al. Progestogens for preventing miscarriage: a network metaanalysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 4: CD013792.

4. Volkov V.G., Chursina O.V. A role of comprehensive cervix assessment in the first trimester of pregnancy for predicting preterm delivery. Akusherstvo, ginekologiya i reproduktsiya [Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction]. 2020; 14 (2): 174-81. (in Russian)

5. Khoperskaya O.V., En’kova E.V., Atyakshin D.A. Assessment of decidual macrophages population in patients with non-developing pregnancy. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology. 2018; 7 (3): 75-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18499/2225-7357-2018-7-3-75-80 (in Russian)

6. Rossen L.M., Ahrens K.A., Branum A.M. Trends in risk of pregnancy loss among US women, 1990-2011. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2018; 32 (1): 19-29.

7. Ozawa N., Ogawa K., Sasaki A., et al. Maternal age, history of miscarriage, and embryonic/fetal size are associated with cytogenetic results of spontaneous early miscarriages. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019; 36 (4): 749-57.

8. Pinar M.H., Gibbins K., He M., et al. Early pregnancy losses: review of nomenclature, histopathology, and possible etiologies. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2018; 37 (3): 191-209.

9. Frolova N.I., Belokrinitskaya T.E. Epigenetic factors and molecular markers of the risk of early pregnancy losses. Ginekologiya [Gynecology]. 2019; 21 (3): 9-16. (in Russian)

10. Savchenko R.R., Kashevarova A.A., Skryabin N.A., Zhigalina D.I., Lopatkina M.E., Nikitina T.V., et al. Analysis of CNVs in anembrionic pregnancy and missed abortions. Medical Genetics. 2018; 17 (3): 49-54. (in Russian)

11. Lobanova E.N., et al. Vaginal microbiocenosis in various clinical forms of miscarriage. Akusherstvo, ginekologiya i reproduktsiya [Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction]. 2019; 13 (1): 13-9. (in Russian)

12. Tsareva N.V. Uterine infertility in endometry hypoplasia. Markers of receptivity and “windows of implantation». Meditsinskiy zhurnal [Medical Journal]. 2020; (3): 40-5. (in Russian)

13. Posiseeva L.V., Petrova U.L. Subfertility in a married couple: emphases on pathogenesis and correction. Russian Bulletin of Obstetrician-Gynecologist. 2018; 18 (3): 34-40. (in Russian)

14. Gallos I., Chu J., et al. Conventional and modern markers of endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2019; 25 (2): 202-23.

15. Posiseeva L.V., Gerasimov A.M., Petrova U.L. Glycodelin in obstetric and gynecological practice: past, present and future. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2020; 26 (3): 11-22. (In Russ.).

16. Bochkova M.S., Zamorina S.A., Timganova V.P., Khramtsov P.V., Rayev M.B. The role of glycodelin in the regulation of the immune system in the context of developing pregnancy. Medical Immunology (Russia). 2019; 21 (4): 603-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15789/1563-0625-2019-4-603-616 (in Russian)

17. Bochkova M.S., Zamorina S.A., Timganova V.P., Khramtsov P.V., Rayev M.B. The role of glycodelin in the regulation of the immune system in the context of developing pregnancy. Medical Immunology (Russia). 2019; 21 (4): 603-16. (in Russian)

18. Shtah A.F., Novikova Y.A., Ishkova M.V., Medvedev V.O. Evaluation of the connection of aborts in anamnesis, the level of papp-a in the blood of pregnant women and term of childbirth. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Povolzhskiy region. Meditsinskie nauki [[Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Volga Region. Medical Sciences]. 2019; 1 (49): 112-24. (in Russian)

19. Hviid Saxtorph M., et al. Are different markers of endometrial receptivity telling us different things about endometrial function? Am J Reprod Immunol. 2020; 84 (6): 35-65.

20. Ordiyants I.M., Pobedinskaya O.S., Barabasheva S.S. Role of organic acids and morpho-immunohistochemical endometrial changes in pathogenesis of non-developing pregnancy. Ulyanovsk Medico-Biological Journal. 2020; (1): 63-71. (in Russian)

21. Hosseini M.K., Gunel T., Gumusoglu E. MicroRNA expression profiling in placenta and maternal plasma in early pregnancy loss. Mol Med Rep. 2018; 17 (4): 4941-52.

22. Lee J.Y., et al. Study of the association between microRNA. Polymorphisms and the risk of recurrent pregnancy loss in Korean women. Genes. 2020; 11 (4): 354.

23. Zhao G., Yang C., Yang J. Placental exosome-mediated Bta-miR-499-Lin28B/ let-7 axis regulates inflammatory bias during early pregnancy. Cell Death Dis. 2018; 9 (6): 704.

24. Bahia W., et al. Identification of genes and miRNA associated with idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss: an exploratory data mining study. BMC Med Genomics. 2020; 13: 1-13.

All articles in our journal are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0 license)