References
1. Obstetric aggression v.2.0 / ed. by V.E. Radzinsky. Moscow: Status-Praesents magazine, 2017. 872 p. (in Russian)
2. Obstetrics: national guidance/ ed. byG.M.Savelyeva, G.T.Sukhikh,V.N. Serov, V.E. Radzinsky. 2nd ed. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2020. 1088 p. (in Russian)
3. Obstetrics: textbook / ed. by V.E. Radzinsky, A.M. Fuchs. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2020. 1056 p. (in Russian)
4. Obstetrics. A guide to practical exercises: a textbook / ed. by V.E. Radzinsky, I.N. Kostin. 6th ed. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2021. 736 p. (in Russian)
5. Chen W., Xue J., Peprah M.K., et al. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley bulbs, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labor. BJOG. 2016; 123 (3): 346-54.
6. Ravanos K., Dagklis T., Petousis S., et al. Factors implicated in the initiation of human parturition in term and preterm labor: a review. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2015; 31 (9): 679-83.
7. Hamilton B.E., Martin J.A., Osterman M.J., et al. Births: final data for 2014. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015; 64 (12): 1-64.
8. Alfirevic Z., Keeney E., Dowswell T., et al. Methods to induce labour: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. BJOG. 2016; 123 (9): 1462-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13981
9. Vannuccini S., Bocchi C., Severi F.M. et al. Endocrinology of human parturition. Ann Endocrinol. 2016; 77 (2): 105-13.
10. Levine L.D., Downes K.L., Elovitz M.A., et al. Mechanical and pharmacologic methods of labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 128: 1357-64.
11. Levine L.D., Valencia C.M., Tolosa J.E. Induction of labor in continuing pregnancies. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 67: 90-9.
12. Rozenberg P., Chevret S., Ville Y. Comparison of pre-induction ultrasonographic cervical length and Bishop score in predicting risk of cesarean section after labor induction with prostaglandins. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2005; 33 (1-2): 17-22.
13. Coste Mazeau P., Hessas M., Martin R., et al. Is there an interest in repeating the vaginal administration of dinoprostone (Propess®), to promote induction of labor of pregnant women at term? (REDINO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020; 21: 51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3985-0
14. Dubourdeau A.L., Berdin A., Mangin M., Ramanah R., Maillet R., Riethmuller D. Obesity and primiparity: Risky delivery? J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015; 44 (8): 699-705.
15. Gauthier T., Mazeau S., Dalmay F., et al. Obesity and cervical ripening failure risk. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012; 25 (3): 304-7.
16. Goetzl L. Methods of cervical ripening and labor induction: pharmacologic. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 57 (2): 377-90.
17. Alfirevic Z., Keeney E., Dowswell T., et al. Labour induction with prostaglandins: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015; 350: h217.
18. Jozwiak M., Oude Rengerink K., Ten Eikelder M.L.G., et al. Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013; 170: 137-45.
19. Eser A., Ozkaya E., Abide C.Y., et al. Transcervical Foley balloon catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2 insert combination vs. vaginal prostaglandin E2 insert only for induction of labor at term: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019; 299: 451-7.
20. Konopka C.K., Glanzner W.G., Rigo M.L., et al. Responsivity to PGE2 labor induction involves concomitant differential prostaglandin E receptor gene expression in cervix and myometrium. Genet Mol Res. 2015; 14 (3): 10 877-87.
21. Mosher A.A., Rainey K.J., Giembycz M.A., et al. Prostaglandin E2 represses interleukin 1 beta-induced inflammatory mediator output from pregnant human myometrial cells through the EP2 and EP4 receptors. Biol Reprod. 2012; 87 (1): 1-10.
22. Unlugedik E., Alfaidy N., Holloway A., et al. Expression and regulation of prostaglandin receptors in the human placenta and fetal membranes at term and preterm. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2010; 22 (5): 796-807.
23. Sugimoto Y., Inazumi T., Tsuchiya S. Roles of prostaglandin receptors in female reproduction. J Biochem. 2015; 157 (2): 73-8.
24. Bakker R., Pierce S., Myers D. The role of prostaglandins E1 and E2, dinoprostone, and misoprostol in cervical ripening and the induction of labor: a mechanistic approach. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017; 296: 167-79.
25. Yount S.M., Lassiter N. The pharmacology of prostaglandins for induction of labor. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013; 58 (2): 133-44.
26. Wing D.A., Sheibani L. Pharmacotherapy options for labor induction. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2015; 16 (11): 1657-68.
27. Pharmaceuticals Ferring Cervidil® [prescribing information]. Par-sippany: Ferring Pharmaceuticals, 2016.
28. Hiersch L., Borovich A., Gabbay-Benziv R., et al. Can we predict successful cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 vaginal inserts? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017; 295: 343-9.
29. Ducarme G., Chesnoy V., Petit L. Factors predicting unsuccessful labor induction with dinoprostone in post-term pregnancy with unfavorable cervix. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015; 44 (1): 28-33.
30. Lesage S., Mercier F.J. Parturiente agee (podcast). Prat En Anesth Reanim. 2014; 18 (3): 164-9.
31. Antonazzo P., Laoreti A., Personeni C., et al. Vaginal dinoprostone versus intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in patients not responsive to a first dose of dinoprostone: a randomized prospective study. Reprod Sci. 2016; 23 (6): 779-84.
32. Ashwal E., Hiersch L., Melamed N., et al. Pre-induction cervical ripening: comparing between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in women with an unfavorable cervix. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014; 27 (18): 1874-79.
33. Ducarme G., Chesnoy V., Petit L. Factors predicting unsuccessful labor induction with dinoprostone in post-term pregnancy with unfavorable cervix. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015; 44: 28-33.
34. Hernandez-Martfnez A., Pascual-Pedreno A.I., Bano-Garnes A.B., et al. Predictive model for risk of cesarean section in pregnant women after induction of labor. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016; 293: 529-38.
35. Du C., Liu Y., Liu Y., et al. Double-balloon catheter vs dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2015; 291: 1221-7.
36. Beckwith L., Magner K., Kritzer S., et al. Prostaglandin versus mechanical dilation and the effect of maternal obesity on failure to achieve active labor: a cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017; 30 (13): 1621-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2016.1220523
37. Agarwal P., Greene D.G., Sherman S., et al. Structural characterization and developability assessment of sustained release hydrogels for rapid implementation during preclinical studies. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2021; 158: 105689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2020.105689
38. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for induction of labour. Geneva : WHO, 2011.