References
1. Radzinskiy V.E. Obstetric aggression.Moscow: StatusPraesens, 2017. (in Russian)
2. Gur'ev D.L., Okhapkin M.B., Gur'eva D.D. et al. The assessment of labor induction efficacy in inpatient department. RMZH Mat' i ditya [RMJ. Mother and Child]. 2020; 3 (1): 9-15. (in Russian)
3. Novikova O.N. Pregnancy and childbirth outcomes after labor induction Fundamental'naya i klinicheskaya meditsina [Fundamental and Clinical Medicine]. 2018; 3 (3): 88-92. (in Russian)
4. Orazmuradov A.A., Khamoshina M.B., Akhmatova A.N., Bekbaeva I.V., Arakelyan G.A., Suleymanova Zh.Z., et al. Programmed labor in gestational diabetes mellitus as a reserve for reducing the frequency of cesarean section. International Journal of Biomedicine. 2021; 11 (2): 156-9.
5. Mukhametova Е.Е., Kzylbaeva М., Kanatova М., Kenesbaeva N., Nurbolatkyzy A., Temirbekov A. Analysis of the outcomes labor induction depending on the method induction. Vestnik KazNMU [Bulletin of KazNMU]. 2016; (1): 26-7. (in Russian)
6. Bettikher O.A., Zazerskaya I.E., Popova P.V., Kustarov V.N. A comparison of the clinical outcomes of induced and spontaneous labour in patients with gestational diabetes. Sakharniy diabet [Diabetes Mellitus]. 2016; 19 (2): 158-63. (in Russian)
7. Blagodarny G.V., Mozgovay E.V. Efficacy and safety of labor induction methods using prostaglandin E1. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh bolezney [Journal of Obstetrics and Women's Diseases]. 2017; 66 (1): 9-20. (in Russian)
8. Baev O.R., Rumyantseva V.P., Tysyachnyu O.V., Kozlova O.A., Sukhikh G.T. Outcomes of mifepristone usage for cervical ripening and induction of labour in full-term pregnancy. Randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017; 217: 144-9.
9. Bakleicheva M.O., Bespalova O.N., Romanova M.L. Foley catheter as the method of choice in preparing the cervix for childbirth in comparison with kelp. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh bolezney [Journal of Obstetrics and Women's Diseases]. 2017; Spec. Issue. (in Russian)
10. Jozwiak M., Bloemenkamp K.W.M., Kelly A.J., Mol B.W.J., Irion O., Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 3: CD001233.
11. Ten Eikelder M.L., Oude Rengerink K., Jozwiak M., de Leeuw J.W., de Graaf I.M., van Pampus M.G., et al. Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2016; 387 (10 028): 1619-28.
12. Yang F., Huang S., Long Y., Huang L. Double-balloon versus singleballoon catheter for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018; 44 (1): 27-34.
13. Saad A.F., Villarreal J., Eid J., Spencer N., Ellis V., Hankins G.D., et al. A randomized controlled trial of Dilapan-S vs Foley balloon for preinduction cervical ripening (DILAFOL trial). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 220 (3): 275.e1.
14. Gavara R., Saad A., Wapner R. Comparison of Misoprostol Ripening Efficacy With Dilapan-S (COMRED). In: Annual Clinical and Scientific Meeting. April 30-May 2, 2021.
15. Gupta J., Chodankar R., Baev O., Bahlmann F., Brega E., Gala A., et al. Synthetic osmotic dilators in the induction of labour - an international multicentre observational study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018; 229: 70-5.