Modern mechanical methods for labor pre-induction

• Khalid Haddad
• Agamurad A. Orazmuradov
• Sergei I. Kyrtikov
• Nozimabonu M. Zokirova

AbstractOne of the main reserves for reducing the frequency of cesarean section is the programming of labor in pregnant women with obstetric and extragenital diseases in order to improve maternal and perinatal outcomes. The success of labor induction (LI) depends on the efficiency of сervical ripening methods before labor induction. In the literature there is a large number of randomized clinical trials that study the efficiency and safety of various сervical ripening methods. The safest and most effective methods are mechanical, in particular hygroscopic cervical dilators (Dilapan-S), which can be used in pregnant groups with low prenatal risk in outpatient, which reduces the number of hospitalizations at the preinduction stage and thereby improves perinatal outcomes.

Keywords:cervical ripening, Dilapan-S, induction of labour

References

1. Radzinskiy V.E. Obstetric aggression.Moscow: StatusPraesens, 2017. (in Russian)

2. Gur'ev D.L., Okhapkin M.B., Gur'eva D.D. et al. The assessment of labor induction efficacy in inpatient department. RMZH Mat' i ditya [RMJ. Mother and Child]. 2020; 3 (1): 9-15. (in Russian)

3. Novikova O.N. Pregnancy and childbirth outcomes after labor induction Fundamental'naya i klinicheskaya meditsina [Fundamental and Clinical Medicine]. 2018; 3 (3): 88-92. (in Russian)

4. Orazmuradov A.A., Khamoshina M.B., Akhmatova A.N., Bekbaeva I.V., Arakelyan G.A., Suleymanova Zh.Z., et al. Programmed labor in gestational diabetes mellitus as a reserve for reducing the frequency of cesarean section. International Journal of Biomedicine. 2021; 11 (2): 156-9.

5. Mukhametova Е.Е., Kzylbaeva М., Kanatova М., Kenesbaeva N., Nurbolatkyzy A., Temirbekov A. Analysis of the outcomes labor induction depending on the method induction. Vestnik KazNMU [Bulletin of KazNMU]. 2016; (1): 26-7. (in Russian)

6. Bettikher O.A., Zazerskaya I.E., Popova P.V., Kustarov V.N. A comparison of the clinical outcomes of induced and spontaneous labour in patients with gestational diabetes. Sakharniy diabet [Diabetes Mellitus]. 2016; 19 (2): 158-63. (in Russian)

7. Blagodarny G.V., Mozgovay E.V. Efficacy and safety of labor induction methods using prostaglandin E1. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh bolezney [Journal of Obstetrics and Women's Diseases]. 2017; 66 (1): 9-20. (in Russian)

8. Baev O.R., Rumyantseva V.P., Tysyachnyu O.V., Kozlova O.A., Sukhikh G.T. Outcomes of mifepristone usage for cervical ripening and induction of labour in full-term pregnancy. Randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017; 217: 144-9.

9. Bakleicheva M.O., Bespalova O.N., Romanova M.L. Foley catheter as the method of choice in preparing the cervix for childbirth in comparison with kelp. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh bolezney [Journal of Obstetrics and Women's Diseases]. 2017; Spec. Issue. (in Russian)

10. Jozwiak M., Bloemenkamp K.W.M., Kelly A.J., Mol B.W.J., Irion O., Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 3: CD001233.

11. Ten Eikelder M.L., Oude Rengerink K., Jozwiak M., de Leeuw J.W., de Graaf I.M., van Pampus M.G., et al. Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2016; 387 (10 028): 1619-28.

12. Yang F., Huang S., Long Y., Huang L. Double-balloon versus singleballoon catheter for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018; 44 (1): 27-34.

13. Saad A.F., Villarreal J., Eid J., Spencer N., Ellis V., Hankins G.D., et al. A randomized controlled trial of Dilapan-S vs Foley balloon for preinduction cervical ripening (DILAFOL trial). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 220 (3): 275.e1.

14. Gavara R., Saad A., Wapner R. Comparison of Misoprostol Ripening Efficacy With Dilapan-S (COMRED). In: Annual Clinical and Scientific Meeting. April 30-May 2, 2021.

15. Gupta J., Chodankar R., Baev O., Bahlmann F., Brega E., Gala A., et al. Synthetic osmotic dilators in the induction of labour - an international multicentre observational study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018; 229: 70-5.

All articles in our journal are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0 license)