Литература/References
1. Blomquist J.L., Munoz A., Carroll M., Handa V.L Association of delivery mode with pelvic floor disorders after childbirth. JAMA. 2018; 320 (23): 2438-47.
2. Bradley M.S., Askew A.L., Vaughan M.H., Kawasaki A., Visco A.G. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: early postoperative outcomes after surgical reduction of enlarged genital hiatus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 218 (5): 514.
3. Buca D.I.P., Liberati M., Falo E., Leombroni M., Di Giminiani M., Di Nicola M., et al. Long-term outcome after surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse with Elevate Prolapse Repair System. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018; 38 (6): 854-9.
4. Chang C.P., Horng H.C., Wang P.H. Complete and thorough evaluation is critical for the initiation of surgery in the management of women with pelvic floor disorders. J Chin Med Assoc. 2018; 81 (10): 851-2.
5. Chunbo Li, Zhiyuan Dai, Huimin Shu. Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018; 19: 160.
6. Fan S.X., Wang F.M., Lin L.S., Song Y.F. Re-treatments of recurrence after pelvic floor repair surgery. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2017; 52 (6): 374-8.
7. FDA public health notification: serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh in repair of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2009; 55 (5): 1235-6.
8. Frigerio M., Mastrolia S.A., Spelzini F., Manodoro S., Yohay D., Weintraub A.Y. Long-term effects of episiotomy on urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019; 299 (2): 317-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-5009-9
9. Gazibara T., Rancic B., Radovanovic S., Kurtagic I., Nurkovic S., Kovacevic N., et al. Climacteric women at work: What lurks behind poor occupational quality of life? Health Care Women Int. 2018; 39 (12): 1350-65.
10. Halpern-Elenskaia K., Umek W., Bodner-Adler B., Hanzal E. Anterior colporrhaphy: a standard operation? Systematic review of the technical aspects of a common procedure in randomized controlled trials. Int Urogynecol J. 2018; 29 (6): 781-8.
11. Hampel C. Implants for genital prolapse: contra mesh surgery Urologe A. 2017; 56 (12): 1583-90.
12. Huemer H. Pelvic organ prolapse Ther Umsch. 2019; 73 (9): 553-558.
13. Laparoscopic inguinal ligament suspension with uterine preservation for pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2018; 54 (Pt A): 28-34.
14. Lo T.S., Al-Kharabsheh A.M., Tan Y.L., Pue L.B., Hsieh W.C., Uy-Patrimonio M.C. Single incision anterior apical mesh and sacrospinous ligament fixation in pelvic prolapse surgery at 36 months follow-up. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 56 (6): 793-800.
15. Lo T.S., Ibrahim R., Karim N.B., Nawawi E.A., Uy-Patrimonio M.C. Transvaginal mesh surgery for management of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse following abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 57 (2): 311-4.
16. Lucas S., Thais G., Christiana C.N., Daniele S.O. Vaginal evisceration related to genital prolapse in premenopausal woman. Int Braz J Urol. 2017; 43 (4): 766-9.
17. de Toledo L.G.M., Costa-Matos A., Hwang S.M., Ramos Richetti R.D., Carramao S.S., Auge A.P.F. Anterior six arms prolene mesh for high stage vaginal prolapse: five years follow-up. Int Braz J Urol. 2017; 43 (3): 525-32.
18. Milsom I., Gyhagen M. Breaking news in the prediction of pelvic floor disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019; 54: 41-8.
19. Pastijn A., Vasseur S., Deneft F. Prolapse and urinary incontinence in women: place of the general practitioner Rev Med Brux. 2018; 39 (4): 273-9.
20. Sanchez-Ferrer M.L., Prieto-Sanchez M.T., Moya-Jimenez C., Mendiola J., Garcfa-Hernandez C.M., Carmona-Barnosi A., et al. Anogenital distance and perineal measurements of the pelvic organ prolapse (POP) quantification system. J Vis Exp. 2018; 139: e57912.
21. Seracchioli R., Raimondo D., Arena A., Gava G., Parmeggiani C., Martelli V., et al. laparoscopic mesh-less cervicosacropexy for uterovaginal prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018; 24 (6): 399-403.
22. Shatkin-Margolis A., Crisp C.C., Morrison C., Pauls R.N. Predicting pain levels following vaginal reconstructive surgery: who is at highest risk? Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018; 24 (2): 172-5.
23. Sveinsdottir E., Gottfredsdottir H., Vernhardsdottir A.S., Tryggvadottir G.B., Geirsson R.T. Effects of an intervention program for reducing severe perineal trauma during the second stage of labor. Birth. 2019; 46 (2): 371-8.
24. Tineke F.M., Kim J.B., Kirsten B.K., Mirjam W. Recurrence risk is associated with preoperatively advanced prolapse stage: is there a difference between women with stage 2 and those with stage 3 or 4 cystocele? Int Urogynecol J. 2017; 28 (7): 983-7.
25. Tolstrup C.K., Lose G., Klarskov N. The Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine prolapse: a review. Int Urogynecol J. 2017; 28 (1): 33-40.
26. Lo T.-S., Al-Kharabsheh A.M., Tan Y.L., Pue L.B., Hsieh W.-C. Uy-Patrimonio M.C. Single incision anterior apical mesh and sacrospinous ligament fixation in pelvic prolapse surgery at 36 months follow-up. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 56: 793800.
27. Zhu Q., Shu H., Du G., Dai Z. Impact of transvaginal modified sacrospinous ligament fixation with mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse-before and after studies. Int J Surg. 2018; 52: 40-3.