Modeling and surgical navigation in operative gynecology
AbstractThe review presents data on the development of modeling technologies and surgical navigation and the possibility of their application in organ-preserving operations on various organs: obtaining visualization, software, adaptation of modeling to practical surgery. The priority of the above technologies is the organpreserving and functional-preserving effect on the operated organ. Is being analyzed the possibility of using three-dimensional models in terms of preoperative examination during laparoscopic operations in operative gynecology. The introduction of modeling technologies in clinical practice is accompanied by the development of another extremely relevant direction - intraoperative surgical navigation.
Keywords:operative gynecology, laparoscopy, 3D-modeling, surgical navigation, ultrasound, MRI, CT
Funding. The study had no sponsor support.
Conflict of interests. The authors declare no conflict of interests.
For citation: Dorfman M.F., Gasparov A.S. Modeling and surgical navigation in operative gynecology Akusherstvo i ginekologiya: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie [Obstetrics and Gynecology: News, Opinions, Training]. 2020; 8 (3): 121-7. DOI: 10.24411/2303-9698-2020-13020 (in Russian)
References
1. Zheng Y., et al. 3D Printout models vs 3D-rendered images: which is better for preoperative planning? J Surg Educ. 2016; 73 (3): 518-23.
2. Karpov O.E., Vetshev P.S., Stoyko Yu.M. Robot-assisted surgery: the global tendencies and the Russian realities. In: Materialy kongressa «Vserossiyskiy kongress khirurgov» [Materials of the Congress «All-Russian Congress of Surgeons»]. Moscow, 2016. (in Russian).
3. CARS 2012. Computer assisted radiology and surgery. Proceedings of the 26th International Congress and Exhibition, Pisa, Italy, June 27-30, 2012. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2012; 7 (1): 1-521.
4. Alberti C. Three-dimensional CT and structure models. Br J Radiol. 1980; 53: 261-2.
5. Phutane P., Buc E., Poirot K. et al. Preliminary trial of augmented reality performed on a laparoscopic left hepatectomy. Surg Endosc. 2018; 32 (1): 514-5.
6. Mahmoud A., Bennett M. Introducing 3-dimensional printing of a human anatomic pathology specimen: potential benefits for undergraduate and postgraduate education and anatomic pathology practice. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015; 139 (8): 1048-51.
7. Varghese A., Doglioli M., Fader A.N. Updates and controversies of robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 62 (4): 733-48.
8. Gasparov A.S., Dubinskaya E.D. Clinical value of the ovarian reserve in reproductive function. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya [Obstetrics and Gynecology]. 2014; (4): 11-6. (in Russian).
9. Dubinskaya E.D., Gasparov A.S., Radzinsky V.E., Barabanova O.E., Dutov A.A. Surgery for endometriomas within the context of infertility treatment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019; 241: 77-81.
10. Gasparov A.S., Dorfman M.F., Dubinskaya E.D., et al. Paraportal localisation of an endometriotic ovarian cyst and its influence on ovarian reserve and intensity of chronic pelvic pains. Voprosy ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii [Problems of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Perinatology]. 2019; 18 (2): 27-33. (in Russian)
11. Dubinskaya E.D., Gasparov A.S., Dutov A.A., et al. Molecular-biochemical factors of toxicity of endometriomas and their influence on ovarian reserve. Voprosy ginekologii, akusherstva i perinatologii [Problems of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Perinatology]. 2020; 19 (1): 45-51. (in Russian)
12. Voytashevskiy K.V., Simonovskaya H.Yu., Rudneva O.D., Makletsova S.A. Rational approach to preserving the reproductive reserve as a guarantee of fertility and informed childbearing: Newsletter. In: V.E. Radzinskiy. Moscow: Redaktsiya zhurnala StatusPraesens. 2015.
13. Byrne N., et al. A systematic review of image segmentation methodology, used in the additive manufacture of patient-specific 3D printed models of the cardiovascular system. J R Soc Med Cardiovasc Dis. 2016; 5: 1-9.
14. Kim G.B., et al. Three-dimensional printing: basic principles and applications in medicine and radiology. Korean J Radiol. 2016; 17 (2): 182.
15. Gillaspie E.A., et al. From 3-dimensional printing to 5-dimensional printing: enhancing thoracic surgical planning and resection of complex tumors. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 101 (5): 1958-62.
16. Lambrecht J.T., et al. Generation of three-dimensional prototype models based on cone beam computed tomography. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2009; 4 (2): 175-80.
17. Kurenov S.N., et al. Three-dimensional printing to facilitate anatomic study, device development, simulation, and planning in thoracic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015; 149 (4): 973-9.e1.
18. Foti P.V., Tonolini M., Costanzo V., et al. Cross-sectional imaging of acute gynaecologic disorders: CT and MRI findings with differential diagnosis-part II // Uterine emergencies and pelvic inflammatory disease. Insights Imaging. 2019; 10: 118.
19. Iraha Y., Okada M., Iraha R., et al. CT and MR imaging of gynecologic emergencies. Radiographics. 2017; 37: 1569-86.
20. Nishihara M., Takeda N., Harada T., et al. Diagnostic yield and morbidity by neuronavigation-guided frameless stereotactic biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging and by frame-based computed tomography-guided stereotactic biopsy. Surg Neurol Int. 2014; 5 (8): 421-6.
21. Boldovskaya E.A. Surgical treatment of voluminous formations of the peri-ampulular region and pancreas in conditions of ultrasound navigation: Autoabsract of Diss. Krasnodar, 2012: 162 p. (in Russian)
22. Krutova V.A., Naumova N.V., Boldovskaya E.A. Surgical treatment of ovarian endometriomas using intraoperative ultrasound. Kubanskiy nauchniy meditsinskiy vestnik [Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin]. 2020; 27 (1): 49-58. (in Russian)
23. Frame M., Huntley J.S. Rapid prototyping in orthopaedic surgery: a user’s guide. Sci World J. 2012; 2012: 838575.
24. Bulanov M.N. Ultrasound gynecology. Lecture course. Moscow: Vidar, 2017: 560 p. (in Russian)
25. Letterie G.S., Marshall L. Evaluation of real-time imaging using a laparoscopic ultrasound probe during operative endoscopic procedures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 16 (1): 63.
26. Glybochko P.V., Alyaev Yu.G. 3D technologies for kidney operations: from virtual to real surgery. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2014. (in Russian)
27. Chou J.E., You J.H., Kim D.K., et al. Comparison of perioperative outomes between robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Eur Urol. 2015; 67 (5): 891-901.
28. Barsness K.A., et al. Preliminary evaluation of a novel thoracoscopic infant lobectomy simulator. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015; 25 (5): 429-34.
29. Khan M., Yu W. On-demand three-dimensional printing of surgical supplies in conflict zones. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015; 78 (1): 201-3.
30. Santis De R., et al. Reverse engineering of mandible and prosthetic framework: effect of titanium implants in conjunction with titanium milled full arch bridge prostheses on the biomechanics of the mandible. J Biomech. 2014; 47 (16): 3825-9.
31. Cui Z.Q., Ling Song Z.P., Hu H.F., Sun S., Chen G.C., et al. Combining pyramidal tract mapping, microscopic-based neuronavigation, and intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging improves outcome of epilepsy foci resection in the sensorimotor cortex. Turk Neurosurg. 2014; 24: 538-45.
32. Pacione D., et al. The utility of a multimaterial 3D printed model for surgical planning of complex deformity of the skull base and craniovertebral junction. J Neuro-surg. 2016; 125 (5): 1194-7.
33. Yang M., et al. Application of 3D rapid prototyping technology in posterior corrective surgery for Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Medicine. 2015; 94 (8): e582.
34. Hakansson A. et al. Patient specific biomodel of the whole aorta - the importance of calcified plaque removal. Vasa. 2011; 40 (6): 453-9.
35. Valverde I., et al. 3D printed models for planning endovascular stenting in transverse aortic arch hypoplasia. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 85 (6): 1006-12.
36. Farooqi K.M., et al. Use of a three dimensional printed cardiac model to assess suitability for biventricular repair. World J Pediatr Congen Heart Surg. 2016; 7 (3): 414-6.
37. Tan H., et al. A Novel preoperative planning technique using a combination of CT angiography and three-dimensional printing for complex toe-to-hand reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2015; 31 (5): 369-77.
38. Fiaschi P., et al. Surgical results of cranioplasty with a polymethylmethacrylate customized cranial implant in pediatric patients: a single-center experience. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016; 17 (6): 705-10.
39. Miyazaki T., et al. Airway stent insertion simulated with a three-dimensional printed airway model. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015; 99 (1): e21-e23.
40. Burdall O.C., et al. 3D printing to simulate laparoscopic choledochal surgery. J Pediatr Surg. 2016; 51 (5): 828-31.
41. Souzaki R., et al. Three-dimensional liver model based on preoperative CT images as a tool to assist in surgical planning for hepatoblastoma in a child. Pediatr Surg Int. 2015; 31 (6): 593-6.
42. Soares M., Sahrari K., Chiti M.C., Amorim C.A., Ambroise J., Donnez J., et al. The best source of isolated stromal cells for the artificial ovary: medulla or cortex, cryopreserved or fresh? Hum Reprod. 2015; 30 (7): 1589-98.
43. Johnson C.M., et al. Mechanical modeling of the human cricoid cartilage using computer-aided design. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2016; 125 (1): 69-76.
44. Shen C., et al. Presurgical nasoalveolar molding for cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 135 (6): 1007e-15e.
45. Ruiters S., et al. Computer-aided design and three-dimensional printing in the manufacturing of an ocular prosthesis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016; 100 (7): 879-81.
46. Kusaka M., et al. Initial experience with a tailor-made simulation and navigation program using a 3-D printer model of kidney transplantation surgery. Transplant Proc. 2015; 47 (3): 596-9.
47. Karpov O.E., Stoyko Yu.M., Maksimenkov A.V., Stepanyuk I.V., et al. Results of operations in colon surgery with usage of laparoscopic technique and robotic assistance. Koloproktologiya [Coloproctology]. 2016; 55 (1): 40-7. (in Russian)
48. Wolf I., Vetter M., Wegner I., Bottger T., Nolden M., Schobinger M., et al. The medical imaging interaction toolkit. Med Image Anal. 2005; 9 (6): 594-604.
49. Popov E.N., Rusina E.I., Sudakov D.S., Dymarskaya Yu.R. Optimization of surgical treatment of ovarian endometriomas in reproductive age. Problemy reproduktsii [Problems of Reproduction]. 2019; 25 (1): 66-73. (in Russian)
50. Garavaglia E., Sala C., Taccagni G., et al. Fertility preservation in endometriosis patients: anti-MCllerian hormone is a reliable marker of the ovarian follicle density. Front Surg. 2017; 4: 40.