To the content
3 . 2020

Differential diagnosis of dorsopathies in pregnancy

Abstract

The aim of this study - differentiation of clinical and anamnestic criteria for dorsopathy of pregnant women of different localization.

Material and methods. A prospective multicenter study conducted. Period: 2019-2020. 87 pregnant women were included: 48 with lower back pain (LBP), 39 with pelvic girdle pain (PGP). Pain, discomfort/pain, the level of personal and situational anxiety, and health in general were evaluated before and after treatment. Dorsopathies were treated at a gestational age >22 weeks. Approaches used in treatment: physical therapy, acupuncture, manual techniques (craniosacral therapy, traction method, myofascial release, post-isometric relaxation, soft tissue techniques).

Results. A method of differential diagnosis of dorsopathies has been developed for LBP (M54.3 and M54.4 according to ICD-X) and PGP (M54.5 according to ICD-X), which is based on reliable signs of differences between these diseases. Thus, PGP is characterized by a large number of injuries of any localization and severity in the anamnesis (OR=3.9; 95% CI 1.49-10.24), while for LBP, the leading signs were a lower level of the beta subunit of chorionic gonadotropin in the blood, a lower location of the placenta edge, but a superior length of the cervix. An important generalizing feature of dorsopathies is the almost complete absence of association with undifferentiated connective tissue dysplasia: none of the examined patients with the established diagnosis of dorsopathy had dysplasia stigmas. The pain syndrome assessed on a numerical rating scale, comparable before the start of treatment, remained higher at the end of treatment with LBP (4.71±0.76 and 0.65±1.03 points, p<0.01), predictably worsening the assessment of health, discomfort/pain, anxiety/depression (p<0.05). The effect of endogenous and exogenous progesterone and its metabolites on dorsopathy remained unclear. Pregnant women with LBP were distinguished from PGP by an increased chance of fixation of the Dura mater in the cervical spine (OR=3,3; 95% CI 1.16-9.41). Craniosacral rhythm was significantly higher for PGP (7.85±1.73 and 7.00±1.24, p=0.01).

Conclusion. Differences between pregnant women with PGP and LBP were established. The pain syndrome in LBP is stopped less effectively than PGP. The gestational determinism of dorsopathy (both PGP and LBP) is confirmed by correlations between general clinical, neurological, ultrasound, laboratory, osteopathic, and psychological parameters, reflecting the versatility of its pathogenesis.

Keywords:dorsopathy, pregnancy, lower back pain, pelvic girdle pain, osteopathy, craniosacral rhythm, fixation of the dura mater, sacrum counternutation

Funding. The study had no sponsor support.

Conflict of interests. The author declare no conflict of interests.

For citation: Radzinskaya E.V. Differential diagnosis of dorsopathies in pregnancy. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie [Obstetrics and Gynecology: News, Opinions, Training]. 2020; 8 (3): 55-61. DOI: 10.24411/2303-9698-2020-13007 (in Russian)

References

1. Belyaeva E.V., Lapshina L.V., Shaposhnikova E.V., Belyaeva M.V. Experience in the management of pregnant women with pathology of the nervous system in the conditions of a day hospital of the consultative and diagnostic department. Lechash-chiy vrach [Attending Physician]. 2019; (3): 56-9. (in Russian)

2. Saxena A.K., Chilkoti G.T., Singh A., Yadav G. Pregnancy-induced low back pain in Indian women: prevalence, risk factors, and correlation with serum calcium levels. Anesth Essays Res. 2019; 13 (2): 395-402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.AER_196_18

3. Tailor Y., Preston-Hsu E. Back pain: clinical updates in women’s health care primary and preventive care review. Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 134 (3): 664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003423

4. Kiapour A., Joukar A., Elgafy H., Erbulut D.U., Agarwal A.K., Goel V.K. Biomechanics of the sacroiliac joint: anatomy, function, biomechanics, sexual dimorphism, and causes of pain. Int J Spine Surg. 2020; 14 (1): 3-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/6077

5. Casagrande D., Gugala Z., Clark S.M., Lindsey R.W. Low back pain and pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy. Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015; 23 (9): 539-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00248

6. Gaidukov S.N., Suslova G.A., Vaganova Ya.A. Comparison of medical rehabilitation methods used to relieve pain in pregnant women with dorsopathies. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh bolezney [Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases]. 2017; LXVI (Special issue): 21-2. (in Russian)

7. Walters Ch.L., West S., Nippita T.A. Pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy. Aust J Gen Pract. 2018; 47 (7): 439-43.

8. Vaganova Ya.A., Suslova G.A., Gaydukov S.N., Bobko A.Ya. The effectiveness of applying medical rehabilitation methods during pregnancy in order to relieve back pain caused by dorsopathy. Pediatr [Pediatrician]. 2018; 9 (2): 30-5. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.17816/PED9230-35 (in Russian, English abstract).

9. Gutke A., Boissonnault J., Brook G., Stuge B. The severity and impact of pelvic girdle pain and low-back pain in pregnancy: a multinational study. Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018; 27 (4): 510-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2017.6342

10. Shijagurumayum Acharya R., Tveter A., Grotle M., et al. Prevalence and severity of low back- and pelvic girdle pain in pregnant Nepalese women. BMC Pregnancy Child. 2019; 19: 247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2398-0

11. Osteopathic diagnosis of somatic dysfunction: Clinical guidelines. In: D.E. Mokhov et al. (eds). Saint Petersburg: Nevskiy rakurs, 2015. (in Russian)

12. Clinical guidelines of the Russian Scientific Medical Society of Internal Medicine on the diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation of patients with the connective tissue dysplasia (first edition) approved by the XII National Congress of Internists on 22-24 November 2017. Meditsinskiy vestnik Severnogo Kavkaza [Medical News of North Caucasus]. 2016; 11 (1): 2-76. URL: https://doi.org/10.14300/mnnc.2018.13037 (in Russian)

13. Smith G.I., Yoshino J., Reeds D.N., Bradley D., Burrows R.E., Heisey H.D., et al. Testosterone and progesterone, but not estradiol, stimulate muscle protein synthesis in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 99 (1): 256-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2013-2835

14. Schertzinger M., Wesson-Sides K., Parkitny L., Younger J. Daily fluctuations of progesterone and testosterone are associated with fibromyalgia pain severity. J Pain. 2018; 19 (4): 410-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/jJpain.2017.11.013

15. Chidi-Ogbolu N., Baar K. Effect of estrogen on musculoskeletal performance and injury risk. Front Physiol. 2019; 9: 1834. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01834

All articles in our journal are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0 license)

CHIEF EDITORS
CHIEF EDITOR
Sukhikh Gennadii Tikhonovich
Academician of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, V.I. Kulakov Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology National Medical Research Center of Ministry of Healthсаre of the Russian Federation, Moscow
CHIEF EDITOR
Kurtser Mark Arkadievich
Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, MD, Professor, Head of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Subdepartment of the Pediatric Department, N.I. Pirogov Russian National Scientific Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
CHIEF EDITOR
Radzinsky Viktor Evseevich
Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, MD, Professor, Head of the Subdepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology with a Course of Perinatology of the Medical Department in the Russian People?s Friendship University

Journals of «GEOTAR-Media»