Perinatal risk factors for pre-eclampsia in pregnant women
AbstractCurrently, preeclampsia maintains a Leading position in the structure of maternal mortality and perinatal morbidity and mortality. In this regard, the early detection of signs of this pregnancy complication is important for the timely identification of risk groups and the development of targeted preventive measures.
The aim is to identify a group of pregnant women with a high degree of perinatal risk of preeclampsia.
Material and methods. A total of 97 pregnant women were examined, of which 45 (46.4%) had at least one of the risk factors for developing preeclampsia (age >35 years, body mass index >30 kg/m2, history of preeclampsia, arterial hypertension before pregnancy, arterial hypertension when setting registered, antenatal fetal death in history, history of HELLP syndrome, history of fetal growth retardation, gestational diabetes, type I diabetes, type II diabetes, thrombophilia (MTGFR), antifostolipid syndrome, kidney disease, high risk of fetal growth retardation (based on the results of screening I) and 55 (54.6%) did not have such factors.
Results. It has been established that an increase in prenatal risk factors occurs throughout pregnancy, but extragenital diseases, mainly in the second trimester, make the largest contribution to the total score during preeclampsia.
Keywords:preeclampsia, prenatal risk factors, pregnancy
Funding. The study had no sponsor support.
Conflict of interests. The authors declare no conflict of interests.
For citation: Kretsu V.N., Savicheva A.M., Ordiyants I.M. Perinatal risk factors for pre-eclampsia in pregnant women. Akusher-stvo i ginekologiya: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie [Obstetrics and Gynecology: News, Opinions, Training]. 2020; 8 (3): 16-9. DOI: 10.24411/2303-9698-2020-13002 (in Russian)
References
1. Kan N.E., et al. Clinical and anamnestic risk factors for the development of preeclampsia in pregnant women. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016; 39-44. (in Russian)
2. Nurgalieva G.T., Tanysheva G.A., Manabaeva K.I. Modern possibilities of predicting preeclampsia and its complications (literature review). Science and health care. 2018; 20 (4): 86-106. (in Russian)
3. Ordiyants I.M., Burenkova I.A., Savicheva A.M., Pobedinskaya O.S. Social and biological characteristics of women with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus according to the nature of disease. Ulyanovskiy mediko-biologicheskiy zhurnal [Ulyanovsk Medical and Biological Journal]. 2017; 4: 67-72. (in Russian)
4. Radzinsky V.E., Arabadzhjan S.I., Ordiyants I.M. Perinatal risk for delayed abdominal delivery. RUDN. Meditsina [RUDN. Medicine]. 2017; 21 (1): 76-83. (in Russian)
5. Simukhina M.A. Severe forms of preeclampsia. Clinical course in modern conditions. Autoabstract of Diss. Moscow, 2018. 24 p. (in Russian)
6. Khlestova G.V. The role of damage to the syncytiotrophoblast of the villi of the placenta in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. In: XI International Congress on Reproductive Medicine: materials. Moscow, 2017: 215-6. (in Russian)