To the content
1 . 2019

Management of patients with abnormal invasive placenta in different gestation age

Abstract

Increasing of caesarean section numbers lead to abnormal invasive placenta (AIP) rate. Management of asymptomatic patients with caesarean scar (CS) and low-lying implantation pregnancy (LLIP) in I trimester is not standardized.

Aim - to compare results of the treatment of AIP in different gestation age for developing management strategy of patients with AIP.

Materials and methods. Retrospective multicentral study of patients with AIP: 1st group (n=37) - LLIP in I-II trimester; 2nd group (n=103) - placenta praevia in patients with CS in II-III trimester. The 1st group was diagnosed based on clinical data, ultrasound examination (US), HCG level. In the 2nd group AIP was suspected by US, MRI, but confirmed during operation and histologically.

Results. In the 2nd group of 103 patients with placenta praevia AIP was verified in 89 (86.4%), blood loss during surgery was significantly higher, than if LLIP was terminated in the 1st group (р<0.0000): organpreserving effect achieved in 48.3%, (in 1st group - 100%) (р<0.0000); postoperative complications took place in 16.9% (in 1st group - 2.6%) (р<0.003).

Conclusion. Patients with AIP have high risk of bleeding and hysterectomy in delivery. Termination of LLIP in the I trimester allowed to reduce risks and to preserve fertility. Early US-examination and consultation for prognosis in the case of pregnancy progression are strongly recommended for patients with previous CS.

Keywords:abnormal invasive placenta, low-lying implantation ectopic pregnancy, cesarean scar pregnancy, hysterectomy, ultrasound

For citation: Penzhoyan G.A., Makukhina T.B., Mingaleva N.V., Solntseva A.V., Amirkhanyan A.M. Management of patients with abnormal invasive placenta in different gestation age. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie [Obstetrics and Gynecology: News, Opinions, Training]. 2019; 7 (1): 79-84. doi: 10.24411/2303-9698-2019-11011. (in Russian)

References

1. Comstock C.H., Bronsteen R.A. The antenatal diagnosis of placenta accrete. BJOG. 2014; 121: 171-82.

2. Timor-Tritsch I.E., Monteagudo A. Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accrete and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 207: 14-29.

3. Timor-Tritsch I.E., Monteagudo A., Cali G., et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy and early placenta accrete share common histology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 43: 383-95.

4. Zosmer N., Fuller J., Shaikh H., Johns J., Ross J.A., et al. Natural history of early first-trimester pregnancies implanted in Cesarean scars. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 46: 367-75.

5. Cali G., Forlani F., Timor-Trisch I.E., et al. Natural history of caesarean scar pregnancy on prenatal ultrasound: the cross-over sign. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 50 (1): 100-4. doi: 10.1002/uog.16216.

6. Cali G., Forlani F., Minneci G., et al. First trimester prediction of surgical outcome in abnormal invasive placenta using the cross-over sign. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 51 (2): 184-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.17440.

7. Timor-Tritsch I.E., Monteagudo A., Cali G., et al. Easy sonographic differential diagnosis between intrauterine pregnancy and cesarean delivery scar pregnancy in the early first trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 215 (2): 225.e1-7.

8. Makukhina T.B., Knyazeva N.A., Makukhina V.V., Kalmykova Yu.!., et al. Ultrasound in low-lying implantation ectopic pregnancy diagnosis at early gestational age. Ul'trazvukovaya i funktsional'naya diagnostika [Ultrasound and Functional Diagnostics]. 2018; (2): 22-32. (in Russian)

9. Harb H.M., Knight M., Bottomley C., et al. Caesarean scar pregnancy in the UK: a national cohort study. BJOG. 2018 Apr 26. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15255.

10. Jurkovic D. Cesarean scar pregnancy and placenta accrete. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 43: 361-2.

11. Jauniaux E., Bhide A. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and outcome of placenta previa accreta after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 217 (1): 27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.050.

12. Timor-Tritsch I.E., Monteagudo A., Cali G., et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy is a precursor of morbidly adherent placenta. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 44: 346-53. doi: 10.1002/uog.13426.

13. Bowman Z.S., Eller A.G., Bardsley T.R., et al. Risk factors for placenta accreta: a large prospective cohort. Am J Perinatol. 2014; 31 (9): 799-804. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1361833.

14. Clinical recommendations (treatment protocol) "Ectopic (ectopic) pregnancy". Mosraw: Russian Ministry of Healthcare, 2017: 35 p. (in Russian)

All articles in our journal are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0 license)

CHIEF EDITORS
CHIEF EDITOR
Sukhikh Gennadii Tikhonovich
Academician of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, V.I. Kulakov Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology National Medical Research Center of Ministry of Healthсаre of the Russian Federation, Moscow
CHIEF EDITOR
Kurtser Mark Arkadievich
Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, MD, Professor, Head of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Subdepartment of the Pediatric Department, N.I. Pirogov Russian National Scientific Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
CHIEF EDITOR
Radzinsky Viktor Evseevich
Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, MD, Professor, Head of the Subdepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology with a Course of Perinatology of the Medical Department in the Russian People?s Friendship University

Journals of «GEOTAR-Media»